5 ms·

It seems that enabling HTTPS on the Internet.org proxy is what the EFF wants out of the project.

• pavanky 11y ago
  That is just the technical issue they are against. They also oppose the internet having singular entities acting as gatekeepers. Here is the summary from the last paragraph. We have confidence that it would be possible to provide a limited free Internet access service that is secure, *and that doesn't rely on Facebook and its partners to maintain a central list of approved sites*. Until then, Internet.org will not be living up to its promise, or its name. (emphasis mine)
  • Rambunctious 11y ago
    Although slightly more nuanced than a blanket YES/NO, it would have been more helpful if there were more concrete suggestions on acceptable process mechanisms for 'limited free Internet access'.
    • nitrogen 11y ago
      "[L]imited" probably means bandwidth limited.