3 ms·
Those that think there is anything new in transumanism should read the 20th century arguments for eugenics, that is essentially what we're talking about albeit
by lootsauce 11y ago
Those that think there is anything new in transumanism should read the 20th century arguments for eugenics, that is essentially what we're talking about albeit with a shiny new techno-hipster coating. This is not speeding up evolution, evolution encodes meaningful adaptations to an environment over eons, not fashionable "enhancements" to a persons "IQ"(however that happens to be measured) that may change from year to year. There is a holistic reality that is so blindly and eagerly thrown off by dreaming of the wonders of a brave post/transhuman future it makes one wonder at what point the post-posthumanists will circle back around and want to recover their true humanity unsullied by their forebears ham-handed tinkering. Good luck with all that, personally I'll stick with my boring old unmodified plain humanness.
- klipt 11y agoYou can't really prevent people from practicing eugenics though. At the lowest level it manifests as dating preferences - everyone prefers to breed with those they find mentally and physically attractive. Direct genetic manipulation is just a stronger way of expressing those preferences.
- M8 11y agoWould you kill defective babies who wouldn't survive let alone procreate before 20th century medicine had arrived?