3 ms·
> Indeed, I'm wondering why the quoted ratio is so low (1.10) Not just that -- from the article: >> To Smithers, the ratio’s doubling since 2009 to 1.10 Havi
by repsilat 11y ago
> Indeed, I'm wondering why the quoted ratio is so low (1.10)
Not just that -- from the article:
>> To Smithers, the ratio’s doubling since 2009 to 1.10
Having "the economy" be "worth" only 55% of its scrap value seems crazy...
- djrogers 11y agoThe 'doubling' is from 1.05 to 1.10 -it's a ratio, not a %age