3 ms·
I agree that there is potentially a distinction. Speech that is restricted in public (eg through a public libel trial) is different to speech that is restricte
by Singletoned 11y ago
I agree that there is potentially a distinction. Speech that is restricted in public (eg through a public libel trial) is different to speech that is restricted by preventing the person from ever speaking.
In the former, you get to state your opinions publicly but then have to defend them, but no secrets are kept.