Your comment is not very clear. Are you saying the article can't be trusted because the method used to collect the contents of it is not representative of what

Your comment is not very clear. Are you saying the article can't be trusted because the method used to collect the contents of it is not representative of what the author is thinking? Or is influenced in some way? If so, wouldn't it be fairly obvious, e.g. the article would seem like gobbledygook? Please elaborate! :-) Edit: This seems adequately explained by another comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9563887 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9563887