4 ms·
Brasilia is definitely the kind of alternate future garden city I'm thinking of. I mean, can you imagine walking between buildings at opposite ends of that area
by bane 12y ago
Brasilia is definitely the kind of alternate future garden city I'm thinking of. I mean, can you imagine walking between buildings at opposite ends of that area? In that heat?
Why not build taller buildings? Crammed together on a grid, provide underground walking areas?
There's certainly no shortage of cars there https://www.google.com/maps/place/Bras%C3%ADlia+-+Federal+District,+Brazil/@-15.800762,-47.881848,3a,75y,40.46h,76.03t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sFRECJOVJcIaPFc3_QeZibg!2e0!4m2!3m1!1s0x935a3d18df9ae275:0x738470e469754a24!6m1!1e1 https://www.google.com/maps/place/Bras%C3%ADlia+-+Federal+Di...
- pharke 12y agoPerhaps there is a different term for the type of city you are thinking of, generally cities such as Letchworth[1] are moreso what is known as a garden city. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letchworth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letchworth
- bane 12y agoAbsolutely. The greenbelt defined cities like Letchworth are definitely a different phenomenon. I'm thinking more of cities as gardens.
- andrewliebchen 12y agoLetchworth is a Garden City. Brasilia is a "towers in a park" type Modernist city. You're interested in "towers in a park." Historically, cities like Brasilia were designed around the logic of the car. For example, most roadway intersections feature over and underpasses, cars are completely segregated from pedestrians. By most accounts, it doesn't work so well.
- bane 12y agoThere's got to be a better term for it. But yeah, this kind of design doesn't seem to work well no matter the density of the buildings. Cities really need to work around pedestrians.