6 ms·
http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/
by pi-squared 11y ago
http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/
- nfoz 11y agoThis site uses javascript and an advertising company to track you.
- nunull 11y agoFrom the source: > yes, I know...wanna fight about it?
- ljk 11y agohow did you discover that? on ghostery it doesn't say anything
- lazyjones 11y agoublock shows it clearly. Ghostery seems to whitelist GA these days?
- wenderen 11y agoIt does for me. Maybe it's a default setting for you? Anyway, uBlock does show it.
- ljk 11y agohmmm ublock for me (on opera) doesn't block the frame where the ad is so I see an area on the page with "cannot be displayed" so for me it looked like adblock plus is still the better option; is there one area where ublock better than adblock?
- ilurk 11y agoIIRC ghostery tracks you. I use NoScript and RequestPolicy (for the moment incompatible with latest version of FF).
- ljk 11y agoi've heard the same thing too, but sometimes ghostery shows stuff noscript doesn't so i use both "just to be safe" but i guess i shouldn't use ghostery?
- breakingcups 11y agoOnly if you opt-in to it.
- Buge 11y agoProbably by viewing the source code and seeing Google analytics stuff.
- mariojv 11y agoThis is awesome. When I had a small college blog running, I build in all in raw HTML with a small bit of CSS. It loaded quickly, and it was a pleasure to edit. I liked it much better than writing tons of JS based on big web frameworks that often had bugs or non-obvious functionality. Even with the small college blog, though, the CSS was a bit much. The fact that sites like this exist: http://howtocenterincss.com/ http://howtocenterincss.com/ seems like a testament to the idea that CSS is a bit broken.
- nindwen 11y agohttp://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/
- droidist2 11y agoWow, this one really is a lot better. Love the Eleanor Roosevelt quote too, she was awesome.
- Thiz 11y agoMuch much better. That's what I'm talking about. Let it breathe. > If your text hits the side of the browser, fuck off forever.
- dredmorbius 11y agoI like both examples, hugely. Though a slight bit more HTML gives yet a better experience IMO: http://stylebot.me/styles/9425 http://stylebot.me/styles/9425 Hrm... CodePen? Sure: http://codepen.io/dredmorbius/pen/KpMqqB?editors=110 http://codepen.io/dredmorbius/pen/KpMqqB?editors=110
- mixmastamyk 11y agoWorse, hard to read since the contrast is so low. Also the author doesn't seem to know about em.
- smorrow 11y agoFirst one is great (and better) in all respects except line width, but I didn't need that new page to tell me that.
- Void_ 11y agoI don't understand why these need to use swear words and aggressive tone? Wouldn't it work just as well without them?
- brianwawok 11y agoMake your own PG version. Doubt it gets as many hits.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- mhurron 11y agoBecause it's motherfucking satire and they wanted to have some fun with that shit, asshole.
- archimedespi 11y agoI agree. It's offensive to the very people who these sites (apparently) want to change, thus they're less likely to change.
- tedunangst 11y agoAlternative theory: it's amusing to the people who find it amusing.
- archimedespi 11y agoThose aren't necessarily the people who are building the reviled types of websites.
- ajkjk 11y agoVery much disagree. It's written for developers, and I've never met any developer who finds profanity offensive. And, more importantly, it makes the whole thing much more eye-catching. It's a fun way to a deliver a message - as a vitriolic, spit-flying rant. It would be ineffective if it was friendly and delicate.
- alansmitheebk 11y agoWas this made by Eric Myers? It looks like part of his (bitter) Fluent Conference presentation.
- Thiz 11y agoBeautiful! Give it a "margin: 1in" and that'd be perfect. I love simplicity.