4 ms·
It is a commonplace that "you can't keep secrets in Washington" or "in a democracy," that "no matter how sensitive the secret, you're likely to read it the next
by jakeogh 11y ago
It is a commonplace that "you can't keep secrets in Washington" or "in a democracy," that "no matter how sensitive the secret, you're likely to read it the next day in the New York Times." These truisms are flatly false. They are in fact cover stories, ways of flattering and misleading journalists and their readers, part of the process of keeping secrets well. --Daniel Ellsberg - Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers
- fixxer 11y agoOr, alternatively, you aren't living in a democracy.
- krick 11y agoOr "a democracy" is just a word that means nothing.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- johnchristopher 11y agoOh no, no, no. Democracy has a real meaning and we shouldn't let the politicians and opinon leaders force us to go along with their double speak.
- stefantalpalaru 11y agoNot any more. Now it just means that the public is involved in the selection of the ruling class, but the degree of this involvement is largely symbolic - see the US case with only 2 viable choices and the widespread gerrymandering.
- sillygoose 11y agoKings and "Nobility" were a ruling class, but we wouldn't accept them anymore. Elected (or not) "representatives" and a bunch of central bankers are another, but they're just fine.
- TrevorJ 11y agoThat sounds good and all, but something a lot of people forget is you don't need to elect a third party for them to make a difference. Third party votes represent a block of voters ripe for cherry picking if one of the two major parties is willing to take a stand on issues that are important to third party voters.