4 ms·
>Most journalists would never dream of confronting CIA officials with the same aggressiveness they now direct at Hersh—even though, less than six months ago, th
by Synaesthesia 11y ago
>Most journalists would never dream of confronting CIA officials with the same aggressiveness they now direct at Hersh—even though, less than six months ago, the Senate released a 500-page report documenting in meticulous detail the dozens of times the CIA blatantly lied to the public, the press, and Congress about torture over the past decade.
>Hersh’s assertion, which has by now been at least partially confirmed by multiple news organizations, that bin Laden was found thanks to a “walk-in” tip—rather than by tracking his courier as the government has claimed—should be a major scandal. For years, the CIA has said it found bin Laden thanks to information about his personal courier—information that was obtained by means of torture.
An agenda to promote the ethical validity of torture.
- sroerick 11y agoThis is the takeaway from all of this. People who are trying to sort out which details are accurate and which are not are missing the point entirely. The government lied about the way Bin Laden was killed, plain and simple. And they did it to justify torture. None of us are any safer because of this.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- rhizome 11y agoYeah, Hersh's story can definitely be considered to be a red herring answer to the government's lies, so the fact remains that even if Hersh's version isn't true to the last detail, Bush still evaded military service, so to speak.