1. independent as in funded almost entirely by google and ads (ads implying a form of surveillance hence privacy issues). 2. Well that's a bold statement to ma

1. independent as in funded almost entirely by google and ads (ads implying a form of surveillance hence privacy issues). 2. Well that's a bold statement to make to say that web analytics have to be third party to provide valuable actionable insights. 3. I don't care about operational efficiency, I care about my privacy. If mozilla sacrifices privacy for operational efficiency, well they do sacrifice privacy. 4. WTF are you talking about,visiting a mozilla webpage that doesn't give away analytics data to a third party gives better privacy than visiting a mozilla webpage that does. This is true whatever the rest of the world does. Besides mozilla has no reach on that billion of websites. I tend to differ, the track record does not exactly point toward shipping great software, nor protecting the interest of individuals. As shown by bugs marked as won't solve and inclusion of controversial features while removing other. So yup, you are missing the point because you seem blinded by your own vision.