4 ms·
He says this statement is not true: "[Darwin] discovered the theory of evolution after studying finches on the Galápagos Islands". Granted, there is certainly
by moioci 11y ago
He says this statement is not true: "[Darwin] discovered the theory of evolution after studying finches on the Galápagos Islands". Granted, there is certainly more to the story than that, but unless he's suggesting that Darwin devised his theory before he went to the Galapagos, the statement is literally true.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- quonn 11y agoWell, "after" has two meanings (temporal + causal) and the one implied here is "because".
- moioci 11y agoNews to me. Cite, please?
- redacted 11y agoI think this dual-meaning for 'after' is quite common, at least in Ireland and UK (and Australia). Here's an example in lieu of a formal citation: 1. After getting dinner, Alice and Bob met friends at a local bar - Purely temporal, one thing followed the other 2. After hearing Alice recommend her gym, Bob signed up for a membership. - Causal (and temporal of course): because of the first thing, the second thing happened You can disambiguate this in many ways, the most common in my experience is to make explicit the time "Darwin discovered the theory of evolution many years after studying finches on the Galápagos Islands"
- SilasX 11y agoI don't think that's different meanings of after, but different typical inferences that a listener might make.
- thaumasiotes 11y agoYou can see the same relationship more clearly in the word since, where the causal sense is much further along.
- GavinMcG 11y ago"After" is used there to suggest a relationship that isn't temporal. English is fun.