3 ms·
Let's say I read an article that is incredibly interesting and useful, but the author uses "methodology" when they could use "method" -- are you advocating that
by loumf 11y ago
Let's say I read an article that is incredibly interesting and useful, but the author uses "methodology" when they could use "method" -- are you advocating that I don't post it?
If someone makes an interesting comment, but makes a word-usage choice you don't agree with, do you think the top voted response should be a correction of that commenter's word choices? I don't mean something egregious -- just a question of style/usage.
If so, I don't agree.
- grownseed 11y agoare you advocating that I don't post it? I do believe you should post it, that is not what I intended to convey, so my apologies for being unclear. I simply think the author should be encouraged to use the appropriate word if possible, since I believe it is in everybody's interest. If someone makes an interesting comment, but makes a word-usage choice you don't agree with, do you think the top voted response should be a correction of that commenter's word choices? The way I see it, it's not a question of whether it is something I agree with or not, it's simply about trying to be precise whenever possible. And no, I don't believe the top voted response should be a correction, but that doesn't mean correcting someone isn't appropriate either.
- brudgers 11y agoOn HN, yes, it is generally inappropriate. People have better things to talk about.