5 ms·
Countries shouldn't exist if they aren't profitable. Weak people should be eliminated. Government shouldn't be in the business of providing for their protecti
by mozumder 11y ago
Countries shouldn't exist if they aren't profitable.
Weak people should be eliminated. Government shouldn't be in the business of providing for their protection and safety. There is no inherent right to defense.
The world is only meant for the strong.
- mindcrime 11y agoCountries shouldn't exist if they aren't profitable. Well, personally I'd argue against the existence of "countries" as we know them today anyway. Voluntarily assembled, organized mutual defense entities, yes. But "nation states" with all these borders, and boundaries, and rules, and regulations, and controls? I say "give 'em the axe".
- mozumder 11y ago> Well, personally I'd argue against the existence of "countries" as we know them today anyway. Voluntarily assembled, organized mutual defense entities, yes. So.. countries then?
- mindcrime 11y agoI guess you either missed, or chose to ignore, the "as we know them today" part of that? Countries today do a lot more than just self defense. So to answer your question - "no".