Thanks for sharing the link. I see that the organization of the paper is rather odd (compared to most scientific papers I read). I would have expected the metho

Thanks for sharing the link. I see that the organization of the paper is rather odd (compared to most scientific papers I read). I would have expected the methods to be described in more detail, nearer to the beginning of the paper, and for the results section to show up after the methods section. I am beginning to get a sense of why this paper was not published in a more notable journal.