3 ms·
I think the ideal would be closer to the asm.js side of things than the JS side. It's nice that I can inspect the source of any page and read high-level code, b
by nemo1618 11y ago
I think the ideal would be closer to the asm.js side of things than the JS side.
It's nice that I can inspect the source of any page and read high-level code, but the tradeoffs aren't worth it anymore. I'd much rather have a generic (and FAST!) low-level language with lots of compilers from/to high-level languages.
We sort-of have that today, with languages that compile to JS, but the reality is that 90% of the time you're going to be writing JS, or at least dealing with it. And personally I'd like to avoid that as much as possible.
- tracker1 11y agoJust do systems development on narrow hardware platforms, and you won't have to deal with JS at all. I don't mean to be snarky, but the reality is that JS is the common interface available to all browsers to access internals in a consistent API. In order for anything else to come of age it would take the cooperation of at least three major browser vendors along with a decade for older deprecated versions to disappear. It's not going to happen, get over it... JS is a pretty nice language and with sourcemaps and tooling, there are a number of other languages that target it. Evolution is happening, and fighting it is like trying to pray to your devine entity to be saved from it all.