3 ms·
It really does not matter. In a free democracy there should be no surveillance of innocents. The sole feeling of being watched alone changes people (someone hel
by aw3c2 11y ago
It really does not matter. In a free democracy there should be no surveillance of innocents. The sole feeling of being watched alone changes people (someone help me with the citation here).
- 0xdeadbeefbabe 11y agoPanopticon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon There is also something named after Caesar where if you treat people like criminals they will become criminals (someone help me with the citation here).
- morganvachon 11y agoI'm not sure if this is the citation you wanted, but it does deal with the issue in the context of public schools: http://ordinary-gentlemen.com/blog/2013/07/19/if-criminals-is-what-you-want-criminals-is-what-youll-get http://ordinary-gentlemen.com/blog/2013/07/19/if-criminals-i...
- antoko 11y agoHawthorne effect? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect
- squidbidness 11y ago> In a free democracy there should be no surveillance of innocents I agree with the sentiment, although I might rephrase it as "There should be no surveillance without a warrant," since in some cases you can't know who is innocent or not without doing surveillance. A warrant is a good implementation of due process for people you want to investigate, but who are still (in theory) presumed innocent.