2 ms·
Uhh, I'm not sure that this article is useful. Plenty of the "men who don't work" are simply unemployed but are not counted on the unemployment numbers because
by cryoshon 11y ago
Uhh, I'm not sure that this article is useful.
Plenty of the "men who don't work" are simply unemployed but are not counted on the unemployment numbers because they've been unemployed for a long time. This population isn't depicted in the article, which looks like a major oversight.
The only reason that there was a "rise of men who don't work" is that there was an economic collapse which we haven't recovered from, and possibly won't ever recover from by the pre-crash definitions of recovery.