4 ms·
> And is it really plausible that more men are disabled today compared to 15 years ago? Yes, that seems plausible to me. For example, there have been a number
by jxf 11y ago
> And is it really plausible that more men are disabled today compared to 15 years ago?
Yes, that seems plausible to me. For example, there have been a number of combat operations the intervening 15 years; if someone left the military due to injury, they would be counted in the disability figures, but not in the employment ones. NPR did a big story on the factors behind this a while ago:
http://apps.npr.org/unfit-for-work/ http://apps.npr.org/unfit-for-work/
Another big factor is that states are incentivized to move people off of welfare (which the individual states pay for) onto disability (which the nation pays for through Social Security). So a rise in disabled workers has also coincided with a decline of people on welfare -- it's just private companies shuffling people around without improving their condition.
To be fair, the NPR article was not without controversy. A number of groups objected to the way it was presented, including former Social Security commissioners.
http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/04/18/177745599/former-social-security-commissioners-and-others-respond-to-our-disability-story http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/04/18/177745599/forme...
- megaman22 11y agoThe numbers of disabled combat veterans are a tragedy, but they are really a drop in the bucket compared to the wider population. The numbers of people that have some medical condition that would allow them to work a job, if such jobs were available, is where the meat of that increase comes in. Then you have the perverse incentives by which someone on the low end of the pay scale can take a job, and be much worse off than if they stay on the dole, due to various other support programs getting cut off (free health care, fuel assistance, SNAP benefits, etc).