3 ms·
Well the fact that they don't use this as intended says a lot. Also the part minding about privacy.
by tdkl 11y ago
Well the fact that they don't use this as intended says a lot. Also the part minding about privacy.
- angry-hacker 11y agoProbably a lot of the workers use some kind of corporate accounts to test apps etc. But I still find it ironic everyone's 'app history' is so dull. Matt Cutts is the only one I've found from Google that looks like it's actually his personal Android ID. Also, it's possible privacy breach in a sense if you find the ID of some celeb, paste it to the same Android Store format, it sometimes redirects it to the person's profile, who is the actual owner of the celeb page. I tried some Playboy models who have for some reason public Google+ pages/profiles and often behind them are some random marketing guys. Example: https://plus.google.com/+MichaelAnthony/ https://plus.google.com/+MichaelAnthony/ Somewhat famous musician. Id is 116849062506250163587 https://play.google.com/store/people/details?id=116849062506250163587 https://play.google.com/store/people/details?id=116849062506... store page.. ?
- nolok 11y agoThe part minding about "privacy" and "not knowing what will be shared" is unsubstantiated though, there is no argument against or for that being part of their reason. All we know, is that they rate very little. And if they're like me or many it's simply that they don't care about rating stuff, I couldn't care less about people reading the amount of stars I give.