4 ms·
I was disappointed to not see Riak covered.
by roder 17y ago
I was disappointed to not see Riak covered.
- z8000 17y agoI really like riak but I would love to see a couple of things (which are coming after talking to the developers): select/put parts of a document instead of fetching to the client, updating, and sending the whole document back; writing map-reduce in something other than erlang (sue me, I am not an erlang expert yet); performing more operations server side on documents in situ. I am playing with these ideas against a json object store, taking inspiration from riak, redis, and couchdb; based on node.js. It's vaporware ATM but if it pans out I'll open it up.