5 ms·
From my limited experience, scrum can work (defining 'work' as 'make people more productive'), and even in the classic situations that give rise to the flaccid
by tragic 11y ago
From my limited experience, scrum can work (defining 'work' as 'make people more productive'), and even in the classic situations that give rise to the flaccid variety (I work for a blue-chip media corporation which is just in the last couple of years trying to build a modern engineering culture basically from scratch, and it happens to work).
A pretty important point for making scrum work, however, is aggressive timeboxing of everything. If you don't want retros to become a 4 hour developer-kvetch about somebody else's team, start by ruthlessly clipping it to 45 minutes.
I understand that this is not always an option in malfunctioning corporate environments; but Kanban/XP/programming motherfkerism wouldn't fly either in those situations.
- Nursie 11y ago>> If you don't want retros to become a 4 hour developer-kvetch about somebody else's team, start by ruthlessly clipping it to 45 minutes. When I rule the world, as they say, every meeting will contain only the people it needs to, "I don't feel this is relevant to my work or that I can contribute" will be the best reason not to attend and time limits will be aspirational in as much as everyone will aspire to beat them by as much as they can. Unfortunately, as a contractor, I can suggest these things but not mandate them.