3 ms·

GP is probably counting on > already existing regulations and policies regarding noise and disruption.

• rodgerd 12y ago
  Which is at odds with his/her propertarian rhetoric. Either s/he believes in the absolute right of property ownership, or s/he doesn't.
  • kijin 12y ago
    False dichotomy. Many people believe that they have the right to do whatever they want, but only up to the point where it begins to interfere with other people's rights. The rest depends on your definition of "interfering with other people's rights." Someone could reasonably believe that subletting is well within the limits of his/her principle whereas noise is not. Others, meanwhile, could argue that both are violations of the principle.