4 ms·
So if you decide to have a few hundred people in your yard for a rave every night, or operate a burning tyre business, that's no-one's concern but your own?
by rodgerd 12y ago
So if you decide to have a few hundred people in your yard for a rave every night, or operate a burning tyre business, that's no-one's concern but your own?
- kijin 12y agoGP is probably counting on > already existing regulations and policies regarding noise and disruption.
- rodgerd 12y agoWhich is at odds with his/her propertarian rhetoric. Either s/he believes in the absolute right of property ownership, or s/he doesn't.
- kijin 12y agoFalse dichotomy. Many people believe that they have the right to do whatever they want, but only up to the point where it begins to interfere with other people's rights. The rest depends on your definition of "interfering with other people's rights." Someone could reasonably believe that subletting is well within the limits of his/her principle whereas noise is not. Others, meanwhile, could argue that both are violations of the principle.