6 ms·

Twitter, but without code

43 points by estraschnov 11y ago

mwill 11y ago
It would be great if there was a link to explore without logging in, because I don't feel particularly compelled to give my details to this site.
- estraschnov 11y ago
  well it'd be hard to make twitter without having handlers, etc., but you can put a random email address :) we're not doing this to collect emails
  - thebouv 11y ago
    So this is your site? That you submitted? Maybe should have been a Show HN?
    - estraschnov 11y ago
      it's one of our users. Could have been a SHOW HN indeed, even though it's more about the idea that you can do that without code than showing twitter
- jamieomatthews 11y ago
  As far as I can tell, the login doesn't actually do anything...I think all this kid is claiming is that he made the login page I guess
  - estraschnov 11y ago
    A lot of people are signing up though. Doens't work for you?
    - jamieomatthews 11y ago
      Ah, you should specify that you need to make an account. For some reason I was thinking this might somehow attempt to do SSO and grab your actual twitter data
      - emodendroket 11y ago
        Lemme just give my actual Twitter login details to some guy I've never heard of.
        estraschnov 11y ago
        You can just type anything. Obviously we don't have access to twitter's db
        emodendroket 11y ago
        Yeah, I realize that.
        nhumrich 11y ago
        Its called OAuth
        estraschnov 11y ago
        yes, but we're not building a client for twitter. it's a clone :)
- emodendroket 11y ago
  Just type any old crap in the registration box and you'll be able to see the authenticated user view.
Singletoned 11y ago
> if we ever for some reason have to close down shop, we will release the Bubble source code under an open-source license so that you can set up your own Bubble server and keep your app running That's quite a nice thing to read. I hope more people start committing to this.
- estraschnov 11y ago
  We're already working on a distribution version and we'll open an API soon so that people can add things that are missing.
captn3m0 11y ago
The level of detail in this makes me doubt the claim (0 lines of code), but assuming it is true: really well done. For those who are wondering if its just a login page: you can register an account (login is automatic on registration, and email verification is not required). The entire UI is almost exactly same as twitter. Link to the framework used: https://bubble.is/ https://bubble.is/
- jamieomatthews 11y ago
  I really like the idea of these 0 lines of code websites, but mostly for more static sites. As you can tell with this site, it's already suffering from lag in a bunch of places, which might be hard to fix. Disclaimer: I have never used bubble.is, but similar products
thebouv 11y ago
So, it lets you prototype apps. That is awesome. Too bad all those engineers are going to be farmers by 2020 though. Because when your prototype gets popular, I doubt Bubble.is can handle all the things that actually make your app run at scale (the deployments, maintenance, database, etc management programming that is really what makes apps like Twitter run .. not just the tiny html/css/js stack that the client plays with).
- emodendroket 11y ago
  It seems like it might be useful for the same kinds of scenarios something like Access is -- basically, end users making small internal tools.
- profinger 11y ago
  No man, who needs engineers now. We can make a registration button that gives an error. That's all you really need to write a website isn't it?
- blixt 11y ago
  I think you're looking at this the wrong way. Today, only about 20 million people[1] are building software for over 3 billion internet connected people[2] (and even more who can get access to software in other ways). That's only about 0.6% of users contributing to the rest. Tools like bubble.is are not replacing the very scarce resource of software engineers, they're just vastly expanding the bubble (har har) of potential developers. The world will always need people (or at least creative robotics) capable of designing and building hardware as well as the software that interfaces with that hardware. But the amount of resources spent on those critical systems will be minuscule compared to the resources spent building very custom things on top of it. It's sort of like how you may be able to build your own computer at home with pre-made components and plug it into the wall and have it start up, without having to know how to generate the electricity required to run it, or how to make the hardware components. In 2020 farmers may very well be building their own application, and if that is the case then most likely the number of people using these "WYSIWYG" tools will outnumber the kind of software engineers we see today. I personally think 2020 is a bit optimistic, but it's clearly the direction in which we're going. [1] http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/there-are-185-million-software-developers-in-the-world-but-which-country-has-the-most/ http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/there-a... [2] http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
onion2k 11y ago
It's Visual Basic for the web then? EDIT: To clarify that, I don't mean that in a nasty, snarky way. VB drove a lot of business software and got huge numbers of people writing software, many of whom weren't employed as developers.
- estraschnov 11y ago
  Exactly, but entirely visual, no Basic
jackreichert 11y ago
It reminds me of all those people saying wysiwyg editors would kill the need to know HTML. Really, they made it possible for developers to work on more complicated and exciting projects. Uncle Phil wants help with his flower store website? He'll be happy with WordPress.com or SquareSpace.com and you can continue working on your stuff without being a bad nephew.
austenallred 11y ago
This may very well be a cool product - I like the idea of people being able to build things without code (how do they architect a DB?). Of course, as a lot of people are pointing out, this approach doesn't scale very well. To be fair, neither did the original Twitter, and it was built on Rails. They're different levels of scale, but if all you really need is a proof of concept this could solve the "How do I find a CTO so we can build a quick app and see if anyone cares?" problem. I'd be careful pitching it (yet) as a "we'll never need engineers again" product, as I don't think that's the case; it is incredibly slow, and it errored out for me three times (http://take.ms/iwa9W http://take.ms/iwa9W). I still haven't been able to get in.
- davidslv 11y ago
  I totally agree with you, the website is really slow, most likely because it ended here...
  - paulmd 11y ago
    If the resulting sites can't handle a traffic spike, it's not that great a tool, is it? No one wants a hammer that shatters if you swing it too hard... Being optimistic, it might just be a hosting problem.
    - austenallred 11y ago
      Ya, to be fair I've seen Wordpress blogs go down under an HN spike, as well as a lot of stuff using socket connections for each user. Not many people build products expecting 100+ people to simultaneously use the site on day one.
davidslv 11y ago
is only me having a slow experience? The concept is actually very interesting, it really makes it very easy to build websites for small businesses.
Milner08 11y ago
Haven't been able to create an account, bugs out constantly and is very slow. Cool for prototyping but honestly it just highlights why we need engineers.
mavdi 11y ago
Don't post on HN of all places and claim we don't need programmers... On a serious note, cool product but we've seen many many many of these sorts of platforms before. They never work outside a niche market simply because programming isn't about typing, but assembling logic.
- Jonovono 11y ago
  I think lots of people on HN are programmers, so probably a good place to post it, no? Good to get the people that will be 'replaced' in 20 years or whatever to start thinking about other ways to use their knowledge or at least thinking about how the industry could evolve in the future!
dansingerman 11y ago
Haven't we been here before? http://worrydream.com/refs/Brooks-NoSilverBullet.pdf http://worrydream.com/refs/Brooks-NoSilverBullet.pdf The hard bit of software engineering is not knowing the syntax and typing the lines of code, but the design and problem solving, that abstractions can't solve. You can make it easier to produce software with better tools, but the fundamental intellectual requirements of software design and implementation will never go away (until you have AIs genuinely powerful enough to write code themselves)
lbotos 11y ago
Twitter is serious about others not using twitter in their domains... "Please don't sue" isn't a real stance on this.
skrowl 11y ago
Oh neat, bubble.is is apparently a WYSIWYG no-code thing that the "developer" of this site says is going to replace software engineers. Yeah, that worked out great for FrontPage didn't it?
adambratt 11y ago
People who are commenting and saying that this doesn't make any sense are missing the real use case here: fast prototyping and iterations. What product manager wouldn't like to be able to quickly test and iterate on concepts without bothering the developers? I feel like if bubble.is can nail this, in a year 90% of "Show HN" product launches and new ideas on Product Hunt will be built with this tool. It's the new and better launchrock as it's actually a reflection of the product.
kimmentr 11y ago
Very soon you might realize, that Twitter is good not bcoz of frontend but the major tech expertise is in the backend systems to handle super high traffic and dispatching messages quickly.
binxbolling 11y ago
I've been using Zoho Creator for years (http://creator.zoho.com http://creator.zoho.com) as a tech-savvy non-developer. Anyone had any experience with both Creator and Bubble and can compare the two?
dfar1 11y ago
I honestly don't think I will ever use something like this because you have to stick to the resources provided. Also they might have released it too soon. I tried signing up and this is the message I get "Sorry, we ran into a temporary bug and can't complete your request. We'll fix it as soon as we can; please try again in a bit!"
jz10 11y ago
The whole thing is built using bubble.is If any of the site's devs are browsing the comments, you might want to address this problem I found while navigating the site: http://imgur.com/h0iUIVw http://imgur.com/h0iUIVw
striking 11y ago
It's seriously slow and it lost my user account picture and status after I clicked away. Maybe this could be a good thing in the future for simple prototyping (to show off to investors, not a general public kind of thing) but the bubble.is pricing advertises "Grow" "Scale" and "Flourish" plans for $460, $1700, and $4200 respectively.[1] I would definitely wait until the architecture here becomes more advanced before trusting them with your entire app. I noticed their architecture was built on JS. JS is a pain in the butt when it comes to sandboxing. Either you run multiple contexts in a V8 engine that can crash each other if one OOMs, or you start up a new process for every instance. Single-threadedness is also not fun to deal with, in terms of efficiency. (Yes, I've explored building a service like this on Node.js. I summarily discovered that it's probably not the best plan.) [1]: https://bubble.is/pricing https://bubble.is/pricing
sosuke 11y ago
I went to bubble.is and every link I clicked asked if I was sure I wanted to leave the page without saving my changes.
coffeebro 11y ago
I got a good laugh out of this- definitely very creative and a good idea. I'd just be careful about the whole "please don't sue us" line. Companies like Twitter take these things very seriously.
profinger 11y ago
"Ran into a temporary bug..." lol Yay for frontpage 2.0. All this seems to do is make it easier for people to not better themselves. "What's this? I can make a website without having to learn anything?! Great! Let me put a million animated gifs on here!"
- profinger 11y ago
  Haha bubble's site did the same thing. Seems like a stable platform.
yAnonymous 11y ago
Why should I use this instead of Dreamweaver?
sgehly 11y ago
I kinda have an issue with the openning statement on the site. It's almost a threat, saying that most programmers will lose their jobs and have to do other things. It's an interesting concept, but the slowness and buginess of the site only show why that will never happen. It's good at creating prototypes/static interfaces, but bubble.is most likely will not be the future of programming for the web. Most sites rely on a complete infrastructure of networks, and unless you can provide a really solid PaaS creator for this, and charge money for the actual infrastructure, most users wont take it seriously. Personally I probably wont use it, but it might be nice for some people on Shark Tank :)
Bedon292 11y ago
Why does Bubble.is make me confirm every single time I try to navigate to another one of its pages? Extremely annoying, and makes me think the product doesn't actually work.
busted 11y ago
I'll wait until the site is responding faster/not erroring to be sure but if it's really as it appears, this is amazing. Attractive customizable design is one thing, but real logins, real graph relationships, real feeds, real filtering for mentions, user photo uploads, potentially real messaging, all without any coding would be (is?) really amazing and covers 99% of all the site creations any laymen could want. It doesn't need to scale especially well for the vast majority of customers. If your first reaction is "this doesn't scale" or "this doesn't eliminate programmers" you have to be a professional point-misser. I'd want to see how intuitive the interface for making this is but it's cool stuff, and as it matures I'm sure will only get more interesting.
- profinger 11y ago
  Except for the fact that it's barking up the wrong tree. This likely won't change anything. It'll just make a new programming market. Now, instead of people going "I don't want to learn to code, I'll just hire a developer." they'll go "I don't want to learn to write a website, I'll just hire a developer". If someone doesn't want to dig in to building something for themselves they won't no matter how easy you make the tools. WYSIWYG editors have been around for decades but programmers still have a job. They've gone from writing crazy cobol to doing .net but they are still doing it.
mahouse 11y ago
>Because in 2020 most programmers won't be engineers. They will be doctors, teachers, farmers, executives... I do not like this narrative at all, and it's becoming pretty common. Do you imagine a doctor saying "Don't worry, in 2020 most physicians won't be doctors, they will be engineers, teachers, farmers, executives"?
- wo_oy 11y ago
  I would love it more if it's doctors teachers farmers executives and engineers. Programming as a tool is apparent now. All these frameworks help people to easily realize their ideas. People can be more multi-disciplined than ever before.
  - mahouse 11y ago
    I understand, but the current situation of all software being shit is going to go even worse with this new approach.
- ksherlock 11y ago
  Do you call a carpenter every time you want to put a nail in the wall to hang a picture? Do you call a doctor to put Neosporin and a band aid on your boo-boo? Do you call an accountant to calculate tips?
  - TTPrograms 11y ago
    Would you then call yourself a nail-hammerer, or are you just somebody who occasionally sloppily hammers a nail or two?
- randomdata 11y ago
  The difference is in the employment structure: * The majority of doctors are self-employed * Farmers are, by definition, owners of the business * Executives tend to be large stakeholders in the companies they manage Institutional school teachers tend to be employees, although I'm not sure about all teachers. However, I did have at least one high school teacher (from years ago) tell us that in the future people would learn on demand over the internet, which is coming true, and largely being provided by people who do not have teaching backgrounds. I expect programmers also tend towards being employees, and thus there is a strong interest to automate/eliminate that work.
wo_oy 11y ago
Nice! I often face the problem of wanting to demoing prototypes of ideas, and coding takes too long. Eventually bubble could add auto-scaling when the app is used by many users, and have a pay model similar to aws.
seivan 11y ago
I liked their demo, but honestly we've seen this before. Even with tools like Unreal you still need to write code if you want to make genuinely good games. Same thing applies to stuff like GameMaker. Build apps without coding - since the 90's.
lloeki 11y ago
The side effect of such products (that I have to love day to day with) is that it really devaluates the work done by software developers when it needs to be done by someone of the trade. When a client comes with a feature request and I say "that'll be 10 days, sir", many scoff at the value and don't understand why, pointing at how easy and quick it is to do A or B in Z assisted development system, glossing over even the skin-deep details. That said I am totally in favor of the "in 2020 most programmers won't be engineers, they'll be [whatever trade uses programming as a tool]". Empowering the users should be the number one goal of every system builder, whether it is via simpler systems (as seen on mobile), more accessible interfaces (from colorblind to sensory to kinetic disabilities), or powerful coding (R, NumPy, iPython, Matlab, Mathematica...) or non-coding (Hypercard...) environments.
markbnj 11y ago
Finding a way to program computers to do what we want without requiring rare and expensive skills is probably one of the largest economic opportunities of the 21st century. Bear in mind that there are already plenty of people in other disciplines who are good at decomposing problems and designing processes. It is the syntax and structure of programming and the depth of its connection to the way the machine works that bars the door to their participation. Meanwhile the world needs more and better software every day, and the overall supply of people who are good at the way we do it now isn't growing at anything like a comparable rate. I'm sure this is not the tool, but I'm also sure that when the tool comes along that busts this open most developers (including myself, in all likelihood) will fail to recognize what it can do and will mock its intentions, just because that's the way we humans work. So, in closing, I leave you with the lines of an old Scottish folk song: If it wasn't for the weavers, what would ye do? Ye wouldn't have your clothes that's made of wool! Ye wouldn't have your coat of the black or the blue If it wasn't for the work of the weavers. A confident bunch, those weavers :).
BjoernKW 11y ago
Regarding software engineering won't be done by software engineers in 5 years time: There are engineers who seem to be focused on the mere plumbing behind applications: DBs, ORMs, web frameworks, REST, SOAP, you name it. When asked to implement a particular solution to a real world problem these developers tend to first argue about whether to use PostgreSQL, MySQL or WhateverDB without even trying to understand the actual problem first. I know this sounds very clichéd but quite a few developers seem to try very hard to live up to the cliché. Believe it or not, in some areas this attitude is almost pervasive. I'd say it's the main reason why recruiting freelance developers mostly works by recruiters matching TLAs instead of developers pitching their services to clients directly (like design agencies do). Anyway, this kind of developers might indeed have a hard time finding a job in 5 years but there will - save for a possible technological singularity - always be the need for people who can fathom a real problem and design a solution.
srmann 11y ago
The idea of lowering the learning curve for website development has fascinated me for the past 10-ish years during my employment in the content management system industry. Every once in a while the idea that a tool can replace a developer surfaces, energizes a few people, and then falls flat for one reason or another. Yet it always resurfaces, likely due to the revolutionary nature of a successful solution. The most common reason for failure I've seen seems to stem from the idea that a website requires a developer due to a website requiring massive amounts of meticulously written text in an esoteric language; by replacing this text with a graphical interface, a website no longer requires a developer who understands how to write this text. Experience leads me to believe a developer serves a much different purpose in building websites. Consider applying this logic to another problem, such as writing. If one builds a tool allowing non-writers to drag correctly spelled words and punctuation onto a page, then a non-writer now has the ability to write gripping novels, impactful research papers, and influential editorials -- and they can do this without knowing how to spell. This doesn't make sense, of course, since writing a book requires a certain understanding of how to communicate effectively, an achievement demanding a much more clever tool. Much like writing a book, writing software also demands a much more clever tool than a graphical, drag-and-drop interface. Developers understand more than how to write text in odd languages; they understand how to solve problems. Creating a graphical interface for building websites doesn't remove the necessity of a developer. On the contrary, it creates more jobs for more developers who specialize in building applications using a drag-and-drop interface.
- blixt 11y ago
  I agree with you mostly, but let's also consider the value of lowering the bar of entry. Once upon a time "software engineer" meant someone punching cards and running them through one out of a handful machines on Earth to execute a piece of logic. In 10 years from now "software engineer" might mean someone who practically draws something on a touchable, wireless surface that weighs less than a couple of those punch cards that used to hold a single logical instruction, and their software is instantly available to billions of people. Or to translate to your analogy: there might have been a lot of brilliant writers in the world that simply never learned how to write, or they never had access to distribution so the only person who read their masterpiece was themselves. Today, with the Internet and computers and better access to schools, we have a lot more writers. There might also be more lower quality content because the bar of entry has been lowered, but I'm absolutely sure there will be a lot more high quality content as well.
seba_dos1 11y ago
Takes a really long time to just reply with an error when trying to register. How is a non-developer supposed to deal with that now? ;]
Koldark 11y ago
If in 2020, all those people are programmers, we are going to have some shitty software! If the people I worked with wrote software, they might fix their own itch and not think about the bigger picture nor the others in the organization.
leichtgewicht 11y ago
The poor guy! If I look at the bubble pricing sheet then this month is going to be a bit costly for him (My assumption is ~100000 hits = 920 USD). Not that he would have any advertising on it ;)

43 points by estraschnov 11y ago

mwill 11y ago

It would be great if there was a link to explore without logging in, because I don't feel particularly compelled to give my details to this site.

estraschnov 11y ago
well it'd be hard to make twitter without having handlers, etc., but you can put a random email address :) we're not doing this to collect emails
- thebouv 11y ago
  So this is your site? That you submitted? Maybe should have been a Show HN?
  - estraschnov 11y ago
    it's one of our users. Could have been a SHOW HN indeed, even though it's more about the idea that you can do that without code than showing twitter
jamieomatthews 11y ago
As far as I can tell, the login doesn't actually do anything...I think all this kid is claiming is that he made the login page I guess
- estraschnov 11y ago
  A lot of people are signing up though. Doens't work for you?
  - jamieomatthews 11y ago
    Ah, you should specify that you need to make an account. For some reason I was thinking this might somehow attempt to do SSO and grab your actual twitter data
    - emodendroket 11y ago
      Lemme just give my actual Twitter login details to some guy I've never heard of.
      - estraschnov 11y ago
        You can just type anything. Obviously we don't have access to twitter's db
        emodendroket 11y ago
        Yeah, I realize that.
        nhumrich 11y ago
        Its called OAuth
        estraschnov 11y ago
        yes, but we're not building a client for twitter. it's a clone :)
emodendroket 11y ago
Just type any old crap in the registration box and you'll be able to see the authenticated user view.

Singletoned 11y ago

> if we ever for some reason have to close down shop, we will release the Bubble source code under an open-source license so that you can set up your own Bubble server and keep your app running That's quite a nice thing to read. I hope more people start committing to this.

estraschnov 11y ago
We're already working on a distribution version and we'll open an API soon so that people can add things that are missing.

captn3m0 11y ago

The level of detail in this makes me doubt the claim (0 lines of code), but assuming it is true: really well done. For those who are wondering if its just a login page: you can register an account (login is automatic on registration, and email verification is not required). The entire UI is almost exactly same as twitter. Link to the framework used: https://bubble.is/ https://bubble.is/

jamieomatthews 11y ago
I really like the idea of these 0 lines of code websites, but mostly for more static sites. As you can tell with this site, it's already suffering from lag in a bunch of places, which might be hard to fix. Disclaimer: I have never used bubble.is, but similar products

thebouv 11y ago

So, it lets you prototype apps. That is awesome. Too bad all those engineers are going to be farmers by 2020 though. Because when your prototype gets popular, I doubt Bubble.is can handle all the things that actually make your app run at scale (the deployments, maintenance, database, etc management programming that is really what makes apps like Twitter run .. not just the tiny html/css/js stack that the client plays with).

emodendroket 11y ago
It seems like it might be useful for the same kinds of scenarios something like Access is -- basically, end users making small internal tools.
profinger 11y ago
No man, who needs engineers now. We can make a registration button that gives an error. That's all you really need to write a website isn't it?
blixt 11y ago
I think you're looking at this the wrong way. Today, only about 20 million people[1] are building software for over 3 billion internet connected people[2] (and even more who can get access to software in other ways). That's only about 0.6% of users contributing to the rest. Tools like bubble.is are not replacing the very scarce resource of software engineers, they're just vastly expanding the bubble (har har) of potential developers. The world will always need people (or at least creative robotics) capable of designing and building hardware as well as the software that interfaces with that hardware. But the amount of resources spent on those critical systems will be minuscule compared to the resources spent building very custom things on top of it. It's sort of like how you may be able to build your own computer at home with pre-made components and plug it into the wall and have it start up, without having to know how to generate the electricity required to run it, or how to make the hardware components. In 2020 farmers may very well be building their own application, and if that is the case then most likely the number of people using these "WYSIWYG" tools will outnumber the kind of software engineers we see today. I personally think 2020 is a bit optimistic, but it's clearly the direction in which we're going. [1] http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/there-are-185-million-software-developers-in-the-world-but-which-country-has-the-most/ http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/there-a... [2] http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

onion2k 11y ago

It's Visual Basic for the web then? EDIT: To clarify that, I don't mean that in a nasty, snarky way. VB drove a lot of business software and got huge numbers of people writing software, many of whom weren't employed as developers.

estraschnov 11y ago
Exactly, but entirely visual, no Basic

jackreichert 11y ago

It reminds me of all those people saying wysiwyg editors would kill the need to know HTML. Really, they made it possible for developers to work on more complicated and exciting projects. Uncle Phil wants help with his flower store website? He'll be happy with WordPress.com or SquareSpace.com and you can continue working on your stuff without being a bad nephew.

austenallred 11y ago

This may very well be a cool product - I like the idea of people being able to build things without code (how do they architect a DB?). Of course, as a lot of people are pointing out, this approach doesn't scale very well. To be fair, neither did the original Twitter, and it was built on Rails. They're different levels of scale, but if all you really need is a proof of concept this could solve the "How do I find a CTO so we can build a quick app and see if anyone cares?" problem. I'd be careful pitching it (yet) as a "we'll never need engineers again" product, as I don't think that's the case; it is incredibly slow, and it errored out for me three times (http://take.ms/iwa9W http://take.ms/iwa9W). I still haven't been able to get in.

davidslv 11y ago
I totally agree with you, the website is really slow, most likely because it ended here...
- paulmd 11y ago
  If the resulting sites can't handle a traffic spike, it's not that great a tool, is it? No one wants a hammer that shatters if you swing it too hard... Being optimistic, it might just be a hosting problem.
  - austenallred 11y ago
    Ya, to be fair I've seen Wordpress blogs go down under an HN spike, as well as a lot of stuff using socket connections for each user. Not many people build products expecting 100+ people to simultaneously use the site on day one.

davidslv 11y ago

is only me having a slow experience? The concept is actually very interesting, it really makes it very easy to build websites for small businesses.

Milner08 11y ago

Haven't been able to create an account, bugs out constantly and is very slow. Cool for prototyping but honestly it just highlights why we need engineers.

mavdi 11y ago

Don't post on HN of all places and claim we don't need programmers... On a serious note, cool product but we've seen many many many of these sorts of platforms before. They never work outside a niche market simply because programming isn't about typing, but assembling logic.

Jonovono 11y ago
I think lots of people on HN are programmers, so probably a good place to post it, no? Good to get the people that will be 'replaced' in 20 years or whatever to start thinking about other ways to use their knowledge or at least thinking about how the industry could evolve in the future!

dansingerman 11y ago

Haven't we been here before? http://worrydream.com/refs/Brooks-NoSilverBullet.pdf http://worrydream.com/refs/Brooks-NoSilverBullet.pdf The hard bit of software engineering is not knowing the syntax and typing the lines of code, but the design and problem solving, that abstractions can't solve. You can make it easier to produce software with better tools, but the fundamental intellectual requirements of software design and implementation will never go away (until you have AIs genuinely powerful enough to write code themselves)

lbotos 11y ago

Twitter is serious about others not using twitter in their domains... "Please don't sue" isn't a real stance on this.

skrowl 11y ago

Oh neat, bubble.is is apparently a WYSIWYG no-code thing that the "developer" of this site says is going to replace software engineers. Yeah, that worked out great for FrontPage didn't it?

adambratt 11y ago

People who are commenting and saying that this doesn't make any sense are missing the real use case here: fast prototyping and iterations. What product manager wouldn't like to be able to quickly test and iterate on concepts without bothering the developers? I feel like if bubble.is can nail this, in a year 90% of "Show HN" product launches and new ideas on Product Hunt will be built with this tool. It's the new and better launchrock as it's actually a reflection of the product.

kimmentr 11y ago

Very soon you might realize, that Twitter is good not bcoz of frontend but the major tech expertise is in the backend systems to handle super high traffic and dispatching messages quickly.

binxbolling 11y ago

I've been using Zoho Creator for years (http://creator.zoho.com http://creator.zoho.com) as a tech-savvy non-developer. Anyone had any experience with both Creator and Bubble and can compare the two?

dfar1 11y ago

I honestly don't think I will ever use something like this because you have to stick to the resources provided. Also they might have released it too soon. I tried signing up and this is the message I get "Sorry, we ran into a temporary bug and can't complete your request. We'll fix it as soon as we can; please try again in a bit!"

jz10 11y ago

The whole thing is built using bubble.is If any of the site's devs are browsing the comments, you might want to address this problem I found while navigating the site: http://imgur.com/h0iUIVw http://imgur.com/h0iUIVw

striking 11y ago

It's seriously slow and it lost my user account picture and status after I clicked away. Maybe this could be a good thing in the future for simple prototyping (to show off to investors, not a general public kind of thing) but the bubble.is pricing advertises "Grow" "Scale" and "Flourish" plans for $460, $1700, and $4200 respectively.[1] I would definitely wait until the architecture here becomes more advanced before trusting them with your entire app. I noticed their architecture was built on JS. JS is a pain in the butt when it comes to sandboxing. Either you run multiple contexts in a V8 engine that can crash each other if one OOMs, or you start up a new process for every instance. Single-threadedness is also not fun to deal with, in terms of efficiency. (Yes, I've explored building a service like this on Node.js. I summarily discovered that it's probably not the best plan.) [1]: https://bubble.is/pricing https://bubble.is/pricing

sosuke 11y ago

I went to bubble.is and every link I clicked asked if I was sure I wanted to leave the page without saving my changes.

coffeebro 11y ago

I got a good laugh out of this- definitely very creative and a good idea. I'd just be careful about the whole "please don't sue us" line. Companies like Twitter take these things very seriously.

profinger 11y ago

"Ran into a temporary bug..." lol Yay for frontpage 2.0. All this seems to do is make it easier for people to not better themselves. "What's this? I can make a website without having to learn anything?! Great! Let me put a million animated gifs on here!"

profinger 11y ago
Haha bubble's site did the same thing. Seems like a stable platform.

yAnonymous 11y ago

Why should I use this instead of Dreamweaver?

sgehly 11y ago

I kinda have an issue with the openning statement on the site. It's almost a threat, saying that most programmers will lose their jobs and have to do other things. It's an interesting concept, but the slowness and buginess of the site only show why that will never happen. It's good at creating prototypes/static interfaces, but bubble.is most likely will not be the future of programming for the web. Most sites rely on a complete infrastructure of networks, and unless you can provide a really solid PaaS creator for this, and charge money for the actual infrastructure, most users wont take it seriously. Personally I probably wont use it, but it might be nice for some people on Shark Tank :)

Bedon292 11y ago

Why does Bubble.is make me confirm every single time I try to navigate to another one of its pages? Extremely annoying, and makes me think the product doesn't actually work.

busted 11y ago

I'll wait until the site is responding faster/not erroring to be sure but if it's really as it appears, this is amazing. Attractive customizable design is one thing, but real logins, real graph relationships, real feeds, real filtering for mentions, user photo uploads, potentially real messaging, all without any coding would be (is?) really amazing and covers 99% of all the site creations any laymen could want. It doesn't need to scale especially well for the vast majority of customers. If your first reaction is "this doesn't scale" or "this doesn't eliminate programmers" you have to be a professional point-misser. I'd want to see how intuitive the interface for making this is but it's cool stuff, and as it matures I'm sure will only get more interesting.

profinger 11y ago
Except for the fact that it's barking up the wrong tree. This likely won't change anything. It'll just make a new programming market. Now, instead of people going "I don't want to learn to code, I'll just hire a developer." they'll go "I don't want to learn to write a website, I'll just hire a developer". If someone doesn't want to dig in to building something for themselves they won't no matter how easy you make the tools. WYSIWYG editors have been around for decades but programmers still have a job. They've gone from writing crazy cobol to doing .net but they are still doing it.

mahouse 11y ago

>Because in 2020 most programmers won't be engineers. They will be doctors, teachers, farmers, executives... I do not like this narrative at all, and it's becoming pretty common. Do you imagine a doctor saying "Don't worry, in 2020 most physicians won't be doctors, they will be engineers, teachers, farmers, executives"?

wo_oy 11y ago
I would love it more if it's doctors teachers farmers executives and engineers. Programming as a tool is apparent now. All these frameworks help people to easily realize their ideas. People can be more multi-disciplined than ever before.
- mahouse 11y ago
  I understand, but the current situation of all software being shit is going to go even worse with this new approach.
ksherlock 11y ago
Do you call a carpenter every time you want to put a nail in the wall to hang a picture? Do you call a doctor to put Neosporin and a band aid on your boo-boo? Do you call an accountant to calculate tips?
- TTPrograms 11y ago
  Would you then call yourself a nail-hammerer, or are you just somebody who occasionally sloppily hammers a nail or two?
randomdata 11y ago
The difference is in the employment structure: * The majority of doctors are self-employed * Farmers are, by definition, owners of the business * Executives tend to be large stakeholders in the companies they manage Institutional school teachers tend to be employees, although I'm not sure about all teachers. However, I did have at least one high school teacher (from years ago) tell us that in the future people would learn on demand over the internet, which is coming true, and largely being provided by people who do not have teaching backgrounds. I expect programmers also tend towards being employees, and thus there is a strong interest to automate/eliminate that work.

wo_oy 11y ago

Nice! I often face the problem of wanting to demoing prototypes of ideas, and coding takes too long. Eventually bubble could add auto-scaling when the app is used by many users, and have a pay model similar to aws.

seivan 11y ago

I liked their demo, but honestly we've seen this before. Even with tools like Unreal you still need to write code if you want to make genuinely good games. Same thing applies to stuff like GameMaker. Build apps without coding - since the 90's.

lloeki 11y ago

The side effect of such products (that I have to love day to day with) is that it really devaluates the work done by software developers when it needs to be done by someone of the trade. When a client comes with a feature request and I say "that'll be 10 days, sir", many scoff at the value and don't understand why, pointing at how easy and quick it is to do A or B in Z assisted development system, glossing over even the skin-deep details. That said I am totally in favor of the "in 2020 most programmers won't be engineers, they'll be [whatever trade uses programming as a tool]". Empowering the users should be the number one goal of every system builder, whether it is via simpler systems (as seen on mobile), more accessible interfaces (from colorblind to sensory to kinetic disabilities), or powerful coding (R, NumPy, iPython, Matlab, Mathematica...) or non-coding (Hypercard...) environments.

markbnj 11y ago

Finding a way to program computers to do what we want without requiring rare and expensive skills is probably one of the largest economic opportunities of the 21st century. Bear in mind that there are already plenty of people in other disciplines who are good at decomposing problems and designing processes. It is the syntax and structure of programming and the depth of its connection to the way the machine works that bars the door to their participation. Meanwhile the world needs more and better software every day, and the overall supply of people who are good at the way we do it now isn't growing at anything like a comparable rate. I'm sure this is not the tool, but I'm also sure that when the tool comes along that busts this open most developers (including myself, in all likelihood) will fail to recognize what it can do and will mock its intentions, just because that's the way we humans work. So, in closing, I leave you with the lines of an old Scottish folk song: If it wasn't for the weavers, what would ye do? Ye wouldn't have your clothes that's made of wool! Ye wouldn't have your coat of the black or the blue If it wasn't for the work of the weavers. A confident bunch, those weavers :).

BjoernKW 11y ago

Regarding software engineering won't be done by software engineers in 5 years time: There are engineers who seem to be focused on the mere plumbing behind applications: DBs, ORMs, web frameworks, REST, SOAP, you name it. When asked to implement a particular solution to a real world problem these developers tend to first argue about whether to use PostgreSQL, MySQL or WhateverDB without even trying to understand the actual problem first. I know this sounds very clichéd but quite a few developers seem to try very hard to live up to the cliché. Believe it or not, in some areas this attitude is almost pervasive. I'd say it's the main reason why recruiting freelance developers mostly works by recruiters matching TLAs instead of developers pitching their services to clients directly (like design agencies do). Anyway, this kind of developers might indeed have a hard time finding a job in 5 years but there will - save for a possible technological singularity - always be the need for people who can fathom a real problem and design a solution.

srmann 11y ago

The idea of lowering the learning curve for website development has fascinated me for the past 10-ish years during my employment in the content management system industry. Every once in a while the idea that a tool can replace a developer surfaces, energizes a few people, and then falls flat for one reason or another. Yet it always resurfaces, likely due to the revolutionary nature of a successful solution. The most common reason for failure I've seen seems to stem from the idea that a website requires a developer due to a website requiring massive amounts of meticulously written text in an esoteric language; by replacing this text with a graphical interface, a website no longer requires a developer who understands how to write this text. Experience leads me to believe a developer serves a much different purpose in building websites. Consider applying this logic to another problem, such as writing. If one builds a tool allowing non-writers to drag correctly spelled words and punctuation onto a page, then a non-writer now has the ability to write gripping novels, impactful research papers, and influential editorials -- and they can do this without knowing how to spell. This doesn't make sense, of course, since writing a book requires a certain understanding of how to communicate effectively, an achievement demanding a much more clever tool. Much like writing a book, writing software also demands a much more clever tool than a graphical, drag-and-drop interface. Developers understand more than how to write text in odd languages; they understand how to solve problems. Creating a graphical interface for building websites doesn't remove the necessity of a developer. On the contrary, it creates more jobs for more developers who specialize in building applications using a drag-and-drop interface.

blixt 11y ago
I agree with you mostly, but let's also consider the value of lowering the bar of entry. Once upon a time "software engineer" meant someone punching cards and running them through one out of a handful machines on Earth to execute a piece of logic. In 10 years from now "software engineer" might mean someone who practically draws something on a touchable, wireless surface that weighs less than a couple of those punch cards that used to hold a single logical instruction, and their software is instantly available to billions of people. Or to translate to your analogy: there might have been a lot of brilliant writers in the world that simply never learned how to write, or they never had access to distribution so the only person who read their masterpiece was themselves. Today, with the Internet and computers and better access to schools, we have a lot more writers. There might also be more lower quality content because the bar of entry has been lowered, but I'm absolutely sure there will be a lot more high quality content as well.

seba_dos1 11y ago

Takes a really long time to just reply with an error when trying to register. How is a non-developer supposed to deal with that now? ;]

Koldark 11y ago

If in 2020, all those people are programmers, we are going to have some shitty software! If the people I worked with wrote software, they might fix their own itch and not think about the bigger picture nor the others in the organization.

leichtgewicht 11y ago

The poor guy! If I look at the bubble pricing sheet then this month is going to be a bit costly for him (My assumption is ~100000 hits = 920 USD). Not that he would have any advertising on it ;)