No, I didn't download them. (As I said: "The single worst-looking one on the examiner.com page was ...".) As mcantelon said, that (while certainly unpleasant a

No, I didn't download them. (As I said: "The single worst-looking one on the examiner.com page was ...".) As mcantelon said, that (while certainly unpleasant and possibly unethical or illegal or both -- but it's hard to be sure in the absence of context; ousted from what? The proposal to go "through official AGU channels" suggests that what's being proposed is unlikely to be too nefarious) has nothing to do with falsifying data.