3 ms·
From what I understand, upvotes signify "this adds to the conversation" and downvotes signify "this subtracts from the conversation" -- it's a stronger sentimen
by lotharbot 11y ago
From what I understand, upvotes signify "this adds to the conversation" and downvotes signify "this subtracts from the conversation" -- it's a stronger sentiment than disagreement, but weaker than trolling or abuse (which is what flags are for.)
If a comment is disagreeable but worthwhile, my preference is to give a substantive response. If a comment is value-subtracting, even if I agree with the sentiment, I'll downvote it (and may take the time to explain the downvote if I think my explanation will be helpful.)
The main attributes I consider to make a comment value-subtracting are:
- substantial factual errors (not just a nitpick, but core to the point)
- gratuitous negativity or unnecessary incivility
- waste of space ("me too", memes or jokes except if they're edw519 caliber, excessive references to irrelevant topics such as mentioning someone else's religion several times in a thread that has nothing to do with that)
- extremely poor reasoning or communication, to the degree that trying to engage substantively becomes difficult
- jorgearturo 11y agoWell then, it seems to me that you have a very healthy approach to votes and flags. It should be common sense but I suspect not everyone with the ability to downvote has such considerations and the HN guidelines¹ offer very little comment on that. I'm guessing that mods think that once you've risen above the downvote reputation threshold you must be qualified and should have a good criteria on how to use this newly given privilege. I'm not trying to tell anyone how to do their job, but maybe it would be useful to add some guidelines for that too (Voting, specifically), I think I like your guidelines. ¹ https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html