3 ms·
Imho, your latter statement would be true except for the inclusion of <canvas> which is there specifically to allow it to be manipulated by JS. You are, of cou
by halosghost 11y ago
Imho, your latter statement would be true except for the inclusion of <canvas> which is there specifically to allow it to be manipulated by JS.
You are, of course, correct though, <canvas> is not actually Turing complete without JS; but then a Turing machine cannot operate without both the ticker tape and the pen to write on it. Given that, JS + <canvas> seems to be a near perfect analog to a Turing machine to me. (Though, I can think of numerous ways that someone might disagree.)
Either way, I would still like to see more in-depth analyses of this interaction; and I find it odd that a discussion of HTML as a programming language would make no mention of it whatsoever.
- BraveNewCurency 11y agoIf you have JavaScript (obviously Turning complete by itself), why do you need canvas?