4 ms·
I'm surprised they went with F205, though. There are 32Lxxx chips with similar capabilities and lower power. The whole thing looks like a quick turn of a refer
by zwieback 12y ago
I'm surprised they went with F205, though. There are 32Lxxx chips with similar capabilities and lower power.
The whole thing looks like a quick turn of a reference design and the real low-cost design will follow later on.
- TickleSteve 11y agoI would agree. It looks like a quick&safe design.... If it takes off, a cost-optimised version will appear.