2 ms·

Interesting, I had not heard of ruby before! (more info here, as linked in TFA https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/03/ruby-support-in-firefox-developer-edition-38/ h

Interesting, I had not heard of ruby before! (more info here, as linked in TFA https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/03/ruby-support-in-firefox-developer-edition-38/ https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/03/ruby-support-in-firefox-de... )

wodenokoto 11y ago
I was really surprised to see this wasn't implemented much earlier. Chrome apparently had support for XHTML 1.1 Ruby since 2010! I am also surprised to see how verbose actual ruby markup is. Better examples of mark-up on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_character#HTML_markup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_character#HTML_markup
- threedaymonk 11y ago
  Its absence has been a persistent irritation to me. I'm glad that I can now retire this: https://github.com/threedaymonk/furigana-shim https://github.com/threedaymonk/furigana-shim
- w1ntermute 11y ago
  It's been possible to add support with an extension[0] for a long time. 0: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/html-ruby/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/html-ruby/
malka 11y ago
At first, I thought they added support for client side scripting in Ruby.