4 ms·
Does this mean that CSS is now Turing-complete, or does it just mean that Turing-completeness is not required to implement FizzBuzz?
by kyllo 11y ago
Does this mean that CSS is now Turing-complete, or does it just mean that Turing-completeness is not required to implement FizzBuzz?
- cporios 11y agoTuring completeness is not required to implement FizzBuzz. But CSS + HTML are turing complete since Rule 110 can be implemented in pure CSS + HTML. EDIT: I'm not entirely right. Here's a good answer: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2497146/is-css-turing-complete http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2497146/is-css-turing-com...
- kyllo 11y agoOK, and I see the Pure CSS Fizzbuzz is likewise not Turing complete, because it would still require a Javascript client to append divs to the document in a loop (or when called) in order to pump the automaton.