4 ms·

And w3schools is provided as a reference :|

• sukilot 11y ago
  Google.com loves w3schools. Top search result for every DHTML query.
  • pestaa 11y ago
    That's one reason you don't search for "DHTML."
    • sukilot 11y ago
      DHTML is a category, not a single search term.
      • path411 11y ago
        I don't think I've heard someone use the term DHTML since the 90s. I don't expect you will get a lot of resources on it.
• collyw 11y ago
  Is the content of w3schools actually bad? Its layout is reasonable, and it seems to have a fairly comprehensive coverage of the topic. Its not overwhelming like w3.org. I can find what I want to know with relative ease (unlike w3.org) I have seen a couple of articles pointing out that their implementation details are bad, but I don't think I have ever gone on there with the intention of clicking "view source"
  • pluma 11y ago
    w3schools isn't an alternative to w3.org. MDN (developers.mozilla.org) is. And so is webplatform.org. w3.org is the W3C, the actual organisation that publishes the CSS and XML specs (and the versioned snapshots of the HTML spec).
  • warfangle 11y ago
    It used to be a goddawful cesspool of misinformation and poor advice. Thus, http://www.w3fools.com/ http://www.w3fools.com/. It's gotten better, but you're better off with MDN.
  • snowwrestler 11y ago
    No, it's not bad. Hating on w3schools is like hating on PHP: a way for a person to socially signal that they are a Real Developer, not some noob.
• merrua 11y ago
  w3schools is fine for students just starting out. Though I'd direct them to the MSN articles (but I'm guessing Google can't)
  • sukilot 11y ago
    You mean MDN?
    • merrua 11y ago
      Sorry yes, Mozilla Developer Network.