4 ms·
I get the criticism because I imagine most of us work in a field other people do not understand the complexity of and would like to over simplify. However, I wo
by stinkytaco 11y ago
I get the criticism because I imagine most of us work in a field other people do not understand the complexity of and would like to over simplify. However, I would rather they have a cursory understanding of what I do, what problems I am trying to solve and the challenges I face than have none. I feel the same about many areas. I think that environmental change is a problem, but I can do little to actually solve the problem other than attempt to understand it and influence policy with my votes or money. I am interested in various scientific fields, but hardly an expert, so I follow them at a surface level. It's not perfect, but I think it's better than nothing.
- wellpast 11y agoOP isn't arguing for "nothing". She is just giving fair warning.
- stinkytaco 11y agoNor was I saying that "nothing" was the argument. I am simply pointing out that TED, science journalism and "storytelling" is generally a societal good, despite their flaws. Should we approach all things critically? Of course. I'm not a big Gladwell fan myself and I can't stomach Godin on a good day, but my view of the TED culture is much more positive for the reasons I outlined above.