It is extremely easy to see how politics got injected into the debate. There was a move from "these are our findings" to "lets try and stop global warming". Th

It is extremely easy to see how politics got injected into the debate. There was a move from "these are our findings" to "lets try and stop global warming". The second step requires government action. Hence, politics. If the climate change scientists had stayed in the "lets refine our findings" area then it would never be political. As soon as you say "lets get the government to do something about this", it is political. There will always be people who question why you should expand government. And it is up to the people trying to expand the government to clearly show WHY we need to. What are you expecting? Some people show up with their computer models and say LOOK, WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING, and no one would object? No one would look at it critically? If the science was so indisputable then the bill would be passed, just like the Clean Air and Clean Water acts were when they showed real science on pollutants.