4 ms·
Huh, odd that Wikipedia had a "citation needed" note on there. This indeed is exactly their business model; we found the same while scouting the news publishing
by thaumaturgy 17y ago
Huh, odd that Wikipedia had a "citation needed" note on there. This indeed is exactly their business model; we found the same while scouting the news publishing market.
- imd 17y agoIt doesn't seem odd to me; just because you find something to be true doesn't mean it doesn't need a citation.
- thaumaturgy 17y agoOh, sorry! I agree, but that wasn't what I meant. What I meant was, we found the information on their site, and I was surprised that WP hadn't gotten around to it. The relevant link is: http://www.examiner.com/assets/examinerfaq.html http://www.examiner.com/assets/examinerfaq.html (under, "Will I be compensated?") I attempted to update the Wikipedia page, but found that the examiner.com domain is blacklisted in WP -- page edits don't allow links to anything in examiner.com. So! Mystery solved, and it'll stay uncited because I'm not about to set aside a bunch of paid projects to take on the bureaucracy that is Wikipedia.