2 ms·

If you want to be really pedantic, there is also the choice between "runtime overhead" and "code overhead" (code specialization). And why not mention the overh

• comex 11y ago
  That first one ain't pedantic; C++ code on the whole tends to generate a lot of assembly bloat with inlined methods and template instantiations, and while executable size probably isn't that important for most use cases, it is for quite a few.
  • Dewie3 11y ago
    It is pedantic in the sense that "overhead" in a programming context will most of the time mean some kind of runtime overhead, unless noted otherwise.