4 ms·
"to show that the balance of forces in this rig as the oars are pulled through the water" If the oars are pulled through the water, the boat wouldn't move.
by obsaysditto 17y ago
"to show that the balance of forces in this rig as the oars are pulled through the water"
If the oars are pulled through the water, the boat wouldn't move.
- pwmanagerdied 17y agoWhat do you mean?
- RiderOfGiraffes 17y agoI suspect his point is that the blades of the oars, when immersed in the water, don't move (much) relative to the water. Approximating the blade as stationary in the water, we can see that the boat moves because of a lever effect. If the oars moved freely through the water there would be no thrust, as would be the case when rowing in liquid helium. However, given the context, it seems a singularly pointless nitpick.
- celoyd 17y agoEspecially considering that, in practice, oars move quite a lot through water. It’s fluid, after all; rowing is not like ski-poling yourself along.
- bmelton 17y agoThe oars move more than a little through the water. It isn't the immutability of the water that allows for traction, it is the drag, or perhaps resistance is a more appropriate term, that gives bite to the oars in the water.