3 ms·

I'd recommend Yorgey's cis194 course to start learning: http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis194/spring13/lectures.html http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis194/spring13/lect

I'd recommend Yorgey's cis194 course to start learning: http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis194/spring13/lectures.html http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis194/spring13/lectures.html Each `lecture` is comprised of recommended reading material (sourced from LYAH, RWH, Typeclassopedia, and others) and some reasonably difficult homework problems that build on the learned concepts.

murphm8 11y ago
Do you recommend Spring 2013 for a reason? The Spring 2015[1] has a similar but different set of lectures/assignments. Do you think that is better/worse? [1] http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis194/ http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis194/
- SirensOfTitan 11y ago
  They're likely both good starting points. From a cursory glance of Spring 2015, here's why I like 2013 more: 2013 starts with Functor and builds into Applicative then Monad. I like this a lot, as each builds on each other: fmap has a tight relationship with <$>, and Monad is pretty much Applicative with bind (>>=). Applicative is a Functor and Monad is an Applicative (as of 7.10 I think). I'm by no means super experienced here, but the 2013 course was the first learning text that really got me into Haskell.
  - ac 11y ago
    > fmap has a tight relationship with <$> Yup, it's really tight: <$> is fmap
- sridca 11y ago
  > Do you recommend Spring 2013 for a reason? There were discussions on preferring Spring 2013 to 2015 here: https://github.com/bitemyapp/learnhaskell/pull/72 https://github.com/bitemyapp/learnhaskell/pull/72 https://github.com/bitemyapp/learnhaskell/issues/40 https://github.com/bitemyapp/learnhaskell/issues/40