3 ms·
If the strength of an argument depends partly on trusting the integrity of a source, why is doubting that integrity a fallacy? In an ideal world you judge expe
by afarrell 12y ago
If the strength of an argument depends partly on trusting the integrity of a source, why is doubting that integrity a fallacy?
In an ideal world you judge experimental results by their reproducibility, but who on HN has the time to reproduce results?
- kenbellows 12y agoIf all you are doing is casting reasonable doubt, that's fine. The logical fallacy arises when you point to the source of a proposition and declare that mouth that spoke it makes it false by nature. There's a big difference between "This pro-coffee study was funded by Big Coffee, so I'm skeptical and would like further studies and independent verification" and "This pro-coffee study was funded by Big Coffee, therefore the conclusion is false and coffee actually isn't good for you." Even if Big Coffee funded this report and benefited from its conclusions, the conclusions may very well still be valid; it would be a fallacy to reject this possibility outright.