3 ms·
Certainly. But OSM allows you (or anyone else) to use their data, make a startup or non-profit to implement such functionality. Google Maps, in contrast is a d
by danieldk 11y ago
Certainly. But OSM allows you (or anyone else) to use their data, make a startup or non-profit to implement such functionality.
Google Maps, in contrast is a data silo. Even if you put data in by contributing it, it's Google's data. The possibilities to implement new ideas on top of it is very limited.
As others say, the stuff that people do with OSM is terrific. E.g. you have communities of mountainbikers who enter data about small paths, level of difficulty in the uphill/downhill direction, etc. You can extract a MTB-specific map out of it (which is exactly what openmtbmap does), which renders on your GPS such that all relevant information for mountainbiking is there, routing is adjusted such that you mainly use interesting paths, etc.
There are a gazillion other interesting applications that are not possible at all with proprietary maps such as Google maps.
Also, these days, the point of interest annotations are better than nearly any other map. Heck, in my area in Germany, even picnic tables, etc. are generally in there.
- Fogest 11y agoIt really depends on how active your area is though. My area is very bare in OSM. While I've added some stuff to it, it is really too much for one person. It has gotten better I'll admit, but is still lacking. I like OpenStreetMaps a lot, I just don't like the options for apps that are out there.