3 ms·
There was nothing in that article providing any substantial evidence that Sweden would extradite him. The GCHQ employees were speculating. As am I, of course.
by Nemcue 11y ago
There was nothing in that article providing any substantial evidence that Sweden would extradite him.
The GCHQ employees were speculating. As am I, of course.
- Sir_Substance 11y agoThe difference is they work for involved intelligence agencies, and you're a pseudo-anonymous punter on an internet board. Their speculation is relevant, yours is not.
- DanBC 11y agoGCHQ employs thousands of people. Why is the idle speculation of a translator or mathematician relevant? Don't forget that they only handed over the non-classified communication. I suspect that the GCHQ employees who know anything would have either not commented or have had their comments classified.