4 ms·
Which is awful! A founder should not have to send a "white, attractive male" because she is female and investors refuse to take her seriously. The culture clear
by gtf21 11y ago
Which is awful! A founder should not have to send a "white, attractive male" because she is female and investors refuse to take her seriously. The culture clearly needs to change.
- cpayne 11y agoIt is totally awful! But it's also the reality (that doesn't make it ok). I thought the same thing - just pay someone to be the face. I don't think it is all that different to a celebrity endorsement...
- sokoloff 11y agoThere's a school of thought that says the founders' job is to figure out how to win, not confine themselves to "what ought to be", but rather win with what is. It may be philosophically objectionable and morally frustrating, but if it's the current reality, you can work with that and increase your chance of succeeding or focus primarily on working against it, rather than on your business. Completely agree that it should change to be gender blind, of course.
- mahouse 11y agoIf you think you can fight prejudice... think again.
- vacri 11y agoMost of the 20th Century was an ongoing war against prejudice in one form or another, with prejudice constantly losing ground.