> I agree she was abused by an uncaring and incompetent prosecution. In passing. > My point was that the article and the comments here and on the article seem

> I agree she was abused by an uncaring and incompetent prosecution. In passing. > My point was that the article and the comments here and on the article seem to insinuate that she was free of culpability and should have never been investigated. I didn't get that impression from the article, or from the comments here. My impression is that everyone agreed the investigation came up with nothing, and the subject should have been dropped. > She had all the red flags. Hell, she could still be a Chinese spy for all we know. Nothing like kicking her while she's down. > but the only thing we know for certain is that the prosecution dropped the case. We don't know why they dropped the case. Poor likelihood to convict is a reasonable assumption. > A lack of evidence isn't proof of innocence. It's certainly insufficient to charge her with a crime, much less convict her. I think my concern with your comment still stands.