6 ms·
Can you define this leaky sand or is just bullshit? There is definitely a lot of churn, but slowly but surely you are seeing certain functional programming app
by lhnz 11y ago
Can you define this leaky sand or is just bullshit?
There is definitely a lot of churn, but slowly but surely you are seeing certain functional programming approaches winning out.
And the language is progressing so much faster than similar dynamic languages like Python.
- brandonmenc 11y ago> the language is progressing so much faster than Because it was a haphazard design. A lot of the progress is just Javascript catching up to thoughtfully designed languages like Python. That's a good and necessary thing, but the fact remains.
- lhnz 11y agoPython ground to a halt around the time Python 3 was released and last time I looked it was still barely progressing. Meanwhile JavaScript has ES6, ES7, TypeScript, npm, Ramda.js. It's long past 'catching up'. It's a healthy ecosystem.
- brandonmenc 11y ago> JavaScript has ES6, ES7, TypeScript, npm, Ramda.js. It's long past 'catching up' Javascript is definitely making great progress, but npm thrown in as an example of how it's "long past catching up?" That's like, bare-minimum required functionality. I'm not trying to attack, but when JS evangelists cite something like npm as a zap-pow feature, skeptics roll their eyes - especially when they've been using pip/rubygems/cpan for a decade or two. Edit: I realize now you were probably citing npm more as evidence of JS having arrived with a healthy ecosystem (true) than as evidence it's leapfrogged others.