3 ms·
Linkbait is accurate. Your article's title and introduction imply drama which by all accounts is non-existent. Reducing to the more accurate title you've sugges
by qeorge 17y ago
Linkbait is accurate. Your article's title and introduction imply drama which by all accounts is non-existent. Reducing to the more accurate title you've suggested above reveals this to be what it is: a non-story.
However, I had never heard about the Google offer. That's pretty cool.
- robg 17y agoEither you learned nothing and so it's a non-story. Or you learning something and so it's a story. Which is it? I found enough interesting details (including the acquisition price which I hadn't seen elsewhere) to make it a linkable story. Seems like a few folks agree. And I simply don't get this meta-complaining, especially since: Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site. If you think something is spam or offtopic, flag it by going to its page and clicking on the "flag" link. (Not all users will see this; there is a karma threshold.) If you flag something, please don't also comment that you did. Editors could have also changed the title here. Why have votes, flags, and even editorial control if you're just going to clutter the comments with meta-complaints?
- pwmanagerdied 17y agoThey're not saying it's just uninformative, they're saying is misleading.