4 ms·
This is my defense of whiteboard interviews. - They are aimed at identifying smart people who know the basics of coding and algorithms. They are intentionally
by formulaT 11y ago
This is my defense of whiteboard interviews.
- They are aimed at identifying smart people who know the basics of coding and algorithms. They are intentionally not domain specific. In my experience, smart people can pick up all the other details over time. I've worked with many people who switched languages and within a few months were (for the purposes of their job) as good as someone with years of experience. Similarly, version control, testing etc. are things you can learn on the job.
- They have worked for major companies. Look at the share price of Google and Facebook over time, or the general feeling that they are successful in their goal of hiring the best people.
- They are fast and scalable. They only take as long as the interview, and they scale well because it's easy to compare the notes of different interviewers. The process takes about 5 hours for the interviewee, and about 10 hours combined for the interviewers.
- anthony_barker 11y agoMy question is if the candidate did a degree at a good school doesn't that prove anything? If they did a similar job for a competitor that doesn't count or has a giant set of github repos does that not count? My feeling is that pressured puzzles are a cop out unless you are trying to filter out low level employees. Also your comparison with share price is not necessarily accurate - #1 company in the past 100 years is Exxon (profit per 100 years). I would argue that they manage their existing employees better than their competitors and fire the weak ones. In 50 years I'll bet no one knows facebook or google - just like no one knows DEC or any other tech company from the 70s except IBM and Oracle. Currently they just have the Zeitgeist going for them.