4 ms·
Interesting points: 1. > That is more than the upper limit calculated on the basis of laboratory tests. Does this mean the panels generated more than they we
by stephengillie 12y ago
Interesting points:
1. > That is more than the upper limit calculated on the basis of laboratory tests.
Does this mean the panels generated more than they were tested to generate?
2. Part of the purpose of the project was to beta test the suitability of their glass surface treatment as a biking/walking surface. (I'm imagining it's textured like a truck bed liner, but transparent.) They did have an incident early on with a bicyclist slipping, related to a stick-on surface, so they switched to a spray-on surface.
3. Commenters slinging arrows at a Conservative strawman for the high price and comparatively low (factor of 500) energy output vs government building rooftops.
- Rafert 12y ago1. No, it means that the panels generated more than the predicted upper bound. As a commenter on the source article mentioned, this year's April was one of the most sunny in recorded Dutch weather history, which might have contributed to this fact.