4 ms·
I must admit that I don't really have the background to process your comment. Can you... give a paragraph or two on what normal is and what organic farmers are
by SomeStupidPoint 11y ago
I must admit that I don't really have the background to process your comment.
Can you... give a paragraph or two on what normal is and what organic farmers are doing differently to cause the difference?
- gameshot911 11y agoI'm confused too - I thought 'organic' meant no pesticides were used.
- Angostura 11y agoIt depends quite considerably on which country you're in. In the UK 'organic' is heavily regulated and means pretty much that, in the U.S it's more lax. But my guess is that the poster is saying that because organic farmers have a much smaller range of less potent sprays available, they have to spray more by volume.
- Melting_Harps 11y agoHmmm.. you'd be surprised, mate; I did spend time in the West part of England and the occasional use of artificial pesticide was not uncommon especially when your top soil has been washed away and been battered due to flooding/erosion like it was in 2014 during those storms. Organic is a label, that while better than conventional is not to be blindly accepted as a panacea--that is why the community part of CSA should not be forgotten.
- gpvos 11y agoCSA = Community-supported agriculture
- Angostura 11y agoI would be surprised, yes. There is a very short list of pesticides that can be used and a slightly longer list that can be used with specific permission. Which pesticides were being used on your farm? And did the farm lose organic certification. But even more - what has pesticide use got to do with top-soil loss? I'm not quite clear.
- domas 11y agoUsually "organic" means that no synthetic pesticides or genetic modification were used. You are allowed to use pesticides from natural sources. In practice it means that organic farmers are using less effective pesticides and must use more of it to reach the same effectiveness. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_certification http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_certification It's a classic Appeal to nature tactic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature
- hibikir 11y agoThere's a variety of differences. One of them is seeds themselves. Modern GMOs, more than being about being resistant to specific herbicides, are about built in pest control. It's part of the sales pitch to farmers: Buy this new seed, and you'll spend less in pesticides. With a traditional seed, a farmer gets to either lose a lot of yield, or use pesticides. Organic farming doesn't ban all pesticides: Some are considered natural, and are used a whole lot to protect the crop. The problem is that organic pesticides are not necessarily less toxic for humans, or less likely to harm the environment. In fact, some organic pesticides are very toxic, even though they are 'natural'. It get worse when we take into account that they have to be used in large quantities. Practical toxicity is affected by how much we use, and then ho much actually 'leaks out' of the farm. We also have the lower yields: A more 'natural' seed tends to yield less in practice, so to get the same number of bushels, you need to plant more plants, and protect more plants. Welcome less forests, and more pesticides! So the picture of toxicity and environmental impact of organic vs GMO+synthetic pesticides is pretty complicated.