3 ms·
True, it's not "new" if your perspective is the last five years. But Roses was one of those people in the wilderness beating this path for 20 years back when th
by fluidcruft 12y ago
True, it's not "new" if your perspective is the last five years. But Roses was one of those people in the wilderness beating this path for 20 years back when the amyloid dogma was overbearing.
It's only been recently now that all the targeted amyloid drugs have not panned out as effectively as hyped, that the dogma is crumbling. Being anti-amyloid is quite hot right now. The actual evidence is still quite mixed.