3 ms·
You will see that a few people ask: why care in the face of such impressive native code compilers: Steel Bank, Clozure, and Embedded (although maybe ECL is shor
by 616c 11y ago
You will see that a few people ask: why care in the face of such impressive native code compilers: Steel Bank, Clozure, and Embedded (although maybe ECL is short for something else; ironically they also needed a new maintainer as the previous guy became busy): porting and bootstrapping.
https://www.common-lisp.net/~bmastenbrook/new-sbcl/porting.html https://www.common-lisp.net/~bmastenbrook/new-sbcl/porting.h...
With CLISP that worked on ARM, I am not sure how much slower it would have been to port SBCL to ARM architectures, which is less <1 year of usable, even though CCL had it for years (and why I started compiling CCL using the AUR mechanism on Arch Linux prior to using SBCL in the official repos, for later playing with RPi stuff).
So, thanks for the awesome Lisp, and thanks to you guys specifically because it is niche and thankless with so many jokes about the Lisp/CL community. Even on HN, you can hear the mumbling when people post Lisp articles.
(hail (clisp))
- jordigh 11y agoThanks, I was looking for an excuse to try to help CLisp. This might be it.
- 616c 11y agoCool. And that is coming from me, someone who knows like %1 of anything CL/Lisp related. Unrelated side bar for initiated: is the actual capitalization of this thing (beyond the terminal of course) CLisp or CLISP? http://clisp.org/ http://clisp.org/ So I noticed that the original title of this link (at least when I started reading) was CLisp, and it had not even occurred to me it was C( language) Lisp maybe, but still I though the caps must br wrong. On their site it is full CAPS, even though that peeves a lot of Lispers who will tell you that is like original Lisp Lisps (or LISP Lisp family languages, to be funny). So can someone chime in and tell us?