3 ms·
Well, this case en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._Riley pertains to your question. Some of the dissenting opinions raise the same questions you do, but there's a
by mpyne 11y ago
Well, this case en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._Riley pertains to your question. Some of the dissenting opinions raise the same questions you do, but there's a reason I had to call them 'dissenting opinions'.
- rmxt 11y agoIf indeed these drones are using Dirtboxes and are indiscriminately tracking people based on cell phone signatures, then I would posit that the combination of [1] and [2], and ongoing issues like [3], make what law enforcement is doing Baltimore disgustingly illegal and oppressive. Targeted and specific aerial imagery and inspection is a totally different ballpark than what these drones are doing. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jones_(2012)#Subsequent_developments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jones_(2012)#... [3] http://motherboard.vice.com/read/court-limits-police-stingray-cell-trackers-for-the-first-time http://motherboard.vice.com/read/court-limits-police-stingra...